Look, night owls have it rough.
In addition to the fact that society refuses to let them follow their natural sleep schedule,
scientists also keep publishingall this grim research
telling them they might diesooner than early birds. Well,
no wonder they can’t fall asleep.
But according to the latest studyof the genetics of chronotypes,
that’s the technical term for whether you
’ re an early bird, or a night owl,
or somewhere in between,
the results are a little more of a mixed bag.
Lots of outside factors can affect your sleep habits,
like your work schedule or your exposure to light.
But whether you’re a morning person can also be more
of a built-in genetic thing.
This latest study, published this week inthe journal Nature Communications,
discovered more than 300 new genes connected to chronotype.
It also found that morning peoplehad greater overall well-being
and a lower risk of certainmental health disorders.
But surprisingly, this research didn’t find
that being a natural night owl could lead
to obesity or Type 2 diabetes,
even though other studies have shown
a connection between thosehealth problems and sleep habits.
The team looked at nearly 700,000 participants,
drawn from a research database in the UK
and people who had sent in their DNA for analysis by a private company.
All of these people also had also been asked to report their chronotype.
From the participants’genetic data,
the researchers were able to identify 351
genetic markers associatedwith being an early or late riser,
only 24 of which had been previously identified.
These newly IDed genes wereinvolved with everything from
circadian rhythms to the developmentof neurons to retinal tissue.
There’s a lot more to explore
when it comes to what all these genes do,
譬如 研究者认为 视网膜发生的变化
but the researchers think changesto the retina, for example,
could affect how light recalibrates your body clock,
which could affect what time of day you get sleepy.
Previous studies had suggested links
between chronotype and things like mental health, weight,
and Type 2 diabetes risk,
so the researchers chose to focus on those health risks in their analysis.
Using advanced statistics,
they were able to analyze more than just correlations,
they could actually calculate whether one thing was likely to cause another.
And they found that being an early bird
strongly predicted a better overall sense of well-being,
as well as a lower risk of depression andschizophrenia.
But they didn’t find that genetic chronotypepredicted obesity or diabetes,
even though they’ve long been reported to be linked to circadian rhythms.
These findings don’t mean those links are wrong,
people who go to sleep and wake up
later are still more likely to have obesity or Type 2 diabetes.
But the connection could be less
about your natural tendency to sleep later and more about
non-genetic factors, like having to wake up early
despite being a natural night owl. Or,
these conditions could be affecting people’s sleep patterns,
rather than the other way around.
There are lots of possible explanations for the association,
we just don’t know.
So we still have a lot more to learn,
but with the huge database of genetic data researchers are compiling,
we’re starting to be able to answer questions we never could before.
Speaking of really big health studies,
researchers from the School of Medicine at the University of Kansas in Wichita
may have some bad news about e-cigarettes.
Their findings, basedn on what 400,000 survey respondents
reported about a wide range
of health behaviors and problems,
suggest that using e-cigarettes is linked to a higher risk
of stroke, heart attack, and just heart disease in general.
For those of you who have continued to Just Say No,
and also been hiding under a rock,
the kerfuffle over e-cigarettes began abouta decade ago.
They were pitched as a healthier alternative to smoking tobacco, and they are?
E-cigarettes or e-cigs,or vape pens
heat a nicotine-packed liquid into a vapor
that can be inhaled by the user,
which gives them all of the buzz
and none of the smoke and tar that comes from traditional cigarettes.
But since they’re so new,
we don’t know nearly as much about the health effects of
e-cigarettes as we do regular cigarettes.
But we do know that they’re definitely not better
than not smoking at all.
And their fun flavors and reputation
as being quote-unquote “ safe ” and also cool fun hip
designs has made them a little more popular these days
with the middle and high school crowds.
In 2016, 11 % of high school students reported having used e-cigarettes,
9 times more than in 2011.
There has also been research that suggests inhaling the flavorings
in e-cig juice can be toxic.
So that’s not great.
And these new results could offer
even more evidence that vaping is just
different from smoking, not necessarily better.
Of the 400,000 respondents to the
2016 health survey the researchers analyzed,
nearly 67,000 of them were e-cig users.
Compared to the 333,000 non-vaping controls,
the e-cigarette users had a 71 % higher risk of strokes
a 59 % higher risk of heart attack
or reduced blood flow to the heart,
and a 40% higher risk of coronary heart disease.
A little over 4 % of the users had already suffered a stroke.
While this certainly seems like adire warning for e-cigarette users,
there are a couple of important things to consider. First,
the e-cigarette users were also twice
as likely to be regular cigarette smokers.
Which… could be a pretty big confounding factor,
since smoking tobacco also
puts you at risk for stroke,heart attack, and heart disease.
To really see the effects of e-cigs on their own,
future studies will have to do a better
job of separating the people who use them from those who use regular cigarettes.
And secondly, this research is still preliminary.
While it’s being presented at ascientific conference next week,
it hasn’t been peer reviewed yet,
which means there could still be problems with it.
That probably won’t stop itfrom making the headlines,
and it does not mean theresults should be discounted.
But it does mean we shouldn’t just accept them
at face value without waiting to see the final paper.
What we do definitely know is that nicotine remains addictive,
so watch out for that.
Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow News!
If you’re interested in keeping up
with groundbreaking discoveries like these or
you want to learn more about all the most fascinating science out there,
you are in the right place!
Just go to youtube.com/scishow and click onthat subscribe button.