If there is one generalisation to hazard about maturity,
it is that it involves neither profoundly idealising,
nor denigrating other people.
But let’s begin with babies.
The pioneering mid-20th century Viennese psychoanalyst Melanie Klein
famously drew attention to something very dramatic that happens in the minds of babies
during feeding sessions with their mothers.
When feeding goes well,
the baby is blissfully happy and sees mummy as ‘good’ .
But if, for whatever reason, the feeding process is difficult,
the baby can’t grasp that it is dealing with the same person
it liked a lot only a few hours or minutes ago.
It is simply filled with rage and hatred.
In order to tolerate this, the baby splits off
from the actual mother a second ‘ bad ’ version
– whom it deems to be a separate, hateful individual,
responsible for deliberately frustrating its wishes,
and in the process,
protecting the image of the good mother in its mind.
因此 在婴儿认知中 一共有两个妈妈
There are, in the baby ’ s mind, two people at large,
one entirely good, the other entirely bad.
Gradually, if things go well,
there follows a long and difficult process
by which the child integrates these two different people
最终 虽然有点遗憾 但却是事实
and comes, sadly but realistically,
to grasp that there is no ideal, ‘ perfect ’ mummy –
just one person who is usually lovely
但也会生气 会忙到没空陪自己 会疲惫
but can also be cross, busy, tired,
who can make mistakes,
and be very interested in other people.
It may be a very long time
since we were being fed as babies.
But the tendency to ‘ split ’ those close to us is always there;
for we don ’ t ever fully outgrow our childhood selves.
In adult life, we may fall deeply in love
and split off an ideal version of someone,
in whom we see no imperfections and whom we adore without limit.
Yet we may suddenly and violently turn against the partner
(or a celebrity or a politician)
someone whose good qualities once impressed us,
the moment we discover the slightest thing that disturbs or frustrates us in them.
We may concludethat they cannot really be good
since they have made us suffer – and
that the only logical verdict is that they are appalling.
We could find it extremely hard to accept
that the same person might be very nice and good in some ways
and strikingly disappointing in others.
The bad version can appear to destroy the good one,
though (of course) in fact these are really just different
and connected aspects of one complex person.
It’s a huge psychological achievement
to accept other humans in their bewildering mixture of good and bad,
capacity to assist us and to frustrate us,
kindness and meanness.
and to see that,
far more than we ’ re inclined to imagine in our furious or ecstatic moments,
most people belong in that slightly sobering,
slightly hopeful grey area that goes by the term ‘ good enough.
’ To cope with the conflict between hope and reality,
our culture should teach us good integration skills,
prompting us to accept with a little more grace what is imperfect in ourselves –
随后 将心比心 接受不完美的他人
and then, by extension, in others.
We should be gently reminded
that no one we can love will ever satisfy us completely
– but that this is never a reason to hate them either.
We should move away from the naivety and cruelty
of splitting people into the camps of the awful and the wondrous,
to the mature wisdom of integrating them into the large collective of the ‘ good enough ’.
Our collection of essays, ” Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person”
proposes that we don’t need perfection to be happy,
as long as we enter our relationships in the right spirit.
Find out more by following the link on your screen now.